Author Topic: Never a compiler for SmplMath  (Read 2347 times)

HSE

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • <AMD>< 7-32>
Re: Never a compiler for SmplMath
« Reply #15 on: August 19, 2016, 03:15:56 AM »
Yes, it's the test that show how one FPU register content (1.0) disappear.
 
Code: [Select]
       
fSlv8 RTOX1 = (CGL*(CAC+KACCD))/(CAC*(CGL+KGLCD/AHOR)) {stck:2}  ; <=== two values pushed on stack
       

Impressive!

Thanks.

qWord

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1463
  • The base type of a type is the type itself
    • SmplMath macros
Re: Never a compiler for SmplMath
« Reply #16 on: August 19, 2016, 03:36:38 AM »
Sorry for that inconvenience, I should had written that to the documentation more clearly, as I did in the Quick-Start guide**.

Your problem is now solved?


** where you can the sentence "The macros assume that the FPU stack is unused, so that all 8 FPU register can be used."
MREAL macros - when you need floating point arithmetic while assembling!

HSE

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 545
  • <AMD>< 7-32>
Re: Never a compiler for SmplMath
« Reply #17 on: August 19, 2016, 03:44:40 AM »
 :t