Author Topic: Waterfox  (Read 6574 times)

Mr Hippy

  • Guest
Waterfox
« on: June 16, 2012, 02:26:50 AM »
http://www.palemoon.org/

I have to say that this browser is AMAZING!

I have finally found a browser that is compiled for 64-bit specifically and can run my Mozilla Firefox extensions -- because it's built on Mozilla's source code, only heavily optimized for modern processors! I can run NoScript to keep my browser and computer secure, while surfing the web at lightning speeds! It let's me run 64-bit plugins like Adobe Flash (I know, I know, HTML5 is the way to go, Flash is insecure and should be banished, although I still think it has good uses for the web. I don't mean to be off-topic, back on track now :lol:) and 64-bit Java applets. I also don't mean for this to be a pitch or advertisement, and I could of made this post more professional. Nevertheless I am just so excited I found this browser. :eusa_dance:

I have tested this browser against Internet Explorer 9 (64-bit) and found that it is at least FOUR times faster in JavaScript tests. http://dromaeo.com/?recommended
I have yet to test it in other benchmarks including DOM and CSS.

This has to be the greatest browser. Looking to make donations to the project in the future. :greenclp:


Review the benchmarks at the bottom of this page. Waterfox is more update to date, so I will go with it. Thanks, Gunner for the suggestion.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2012, 01:19:18 PM by Mr Hippy »

y5023

  • Guest
Re: Pale Moon Project
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2012, 10:27:13 AM »

看起来不错, :greenclp:
Google translation

Mr Hippy

  • Guest
Re: Pale Moon Project
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2012, 10:32:59 AM »
Glad I could help at least one person. :P

Hutch, surely you will have a look at it since you run a 64-bit computer. Unless, you are an IE fanboy. :lol:

Gunner

  • Regular Member
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • Gunners Software
Re: Pale Moon Project
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2012, 11:08:09 AM »
There are so many FireFox variants around.
WaterFox is only 64bit, you might want to try it: http://waterfoxproject.org/
~Rob

hutch--

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10583
  • Mnemonic Driven API Grinder
    • The MASM32 SDK
Re: Pale Moon Project
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2012, 12:01:57 PM »
 :biggrin:

> Hutch, surely you will have a look at it since you run a 64-bit computer. Unless, you are an IE fanboy.

I wonder why anyone would think I need to find things to do, trust me I have enough to do.   :P
hutch at movsd dot com
http://www.masm32.com    :biggrin:  :skrewy:

Mr Hippy

  • Guest
Re: Pale Moon Project
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2012, 12:24:43 PM »
Gunner,

Thank you for that link. I found some benchmarks (https://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/021312-firefox-faceoff-255880.html?page=1), which claim Waterfox as the fastest, by a small margin, but still fastest.

Mr Hippy

  • Guest
Re: Pale Moon Project
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2012, 01:01:30 PM »
I am back after benchmarking both Pale Moon (x64) and Waterfox (x64) and I have come to the conclusion that Waterfox is faster.

Setup: Both browsers had all add-ons disabled, but common plug-ins (Flash, Java, Office) were still enabled because they should not pose a significant interference, if any.


SunSpider Javascript Tests: (http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html)

Pale Moon:
Code: [Select]
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                 263.5ms +/- 6.1%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   42.1ms +/- 9.1%
    cube:               16.3ms +/- 10.3%
    morph:               8.6ms +/- 12.5%
    raytrace:           17.2ms +/- 10.7%

  access:               21.9ms +/- 5.2%
    binary-trees:        2.9ms +/- 7.8%
    fannkuch:            9.1ms +/- 4.5%
    nbody:               4.6ms +/- 10.9%
    nsieve:              5.3ms +/- 11.1%

  bitops:               16.0ms +/- 7.6%
    3bit-bits-in-byte:   1.0ms +/- 0.0%
    bits-in-byte:        6.5ms +/- 10.7%
    bitwise-and:         4.3ms +/- 11.2%
    nsieve-bits:         4.2ms +/- 13.4%

  controlflow:           3.2ms +/- 17.6%
    recursive:           3.2ms +/- 17.6%

  crypto:               22.9ms +/- 11.4%
    aes:                11.9ms +/- 13.7%
    md5:                 6.4ms +/- 13.1%
    sha1:                4.6ms +/- 10.9%

  date:                 43.1ms +/- 5.2%
    format-tofte:       21.6ms +/- 6.1%
    format-xparb:       21.5ms +/- 6.1%

  math:                 20.5ms +/- 9.0%
    cordic:              4.5ms +/- 8.4%
    partial-sums:       12.5ms +/- 9.8%
    spectral-norm:       3.5ms +/- 14.4%

  regexp:               14.9ms +/- 11.4%
    dna:                14.9ms +/- 11.4%

  string:               78.9ms +/- 7.9%
    base64:              6.5ms +/- 15.8%
    fasta:               9.3ms +/- 6.3%
    tagcloud:           25.1ms +/- 10.2%
    unpack-code:        29.7ms +/- 11.7%
    validate-input:      8.3ms +/- 5.8%

Waterfox:
Code: [Select]
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                 227.2ms +/- 1.2%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   37.0ms +/- 4.2%
    cube:               14.8ms +/- 5.0%
    morph:               7.8ms +/- 5.8%
    raytrace:           14.4ms +/- 4.2%

  access:               20.8ms +/- 5.1%
    binary-trees:        2.8ms +/- 10.8%
    fannkuch:            9.3ms +/- 7.3%
    nbody:               4.4ms +/- 8.4%
    nsieve:              4.3ms +/- 8.0%

  bitops:               15.5ms +/- 4.5%
    3bit-bits-in-byte:   1.0ms +/- 0.0%
    bits-in-byte:        6.4ms +/- 7.8%
    bitwise-and:         4.2ms +/- 7.2%
    nsieve-bits:         3.9ms +/- 10.4%

  controlflow:           2.8ms +/- 16.1%
    recursive:           2.8ms +/- 16.1%

  crypto:               22.5ms +/- 3.1%
    aes:                11.1ms +/- 5.6%
    md5:                 7.2ms +/- 6.3%
    sha1:                4.2ms +/- 7.2%

  date:                 34.1ms +/- 3.3%
    format-tofte:       17.2ms +/- 3.8%
    format-xparb:       16.9ms +/- 5.1%

  math:                 17.8ms +/- 4.6%
    cordic:              4.4ms +/- 8.4%
    partial-sums:       10.2ms +/- 5.5%
    spectral-norm:       3.2ms +/- 9.4%

  regexp:               13.8ms +/- 4.1%
    dna:                13.8ms +/- 4.1%

  string:               62.9ms +/- 2.1%
    base64:              5.2ms +/- 5.8%
    fasta:               8.2ms +/- 5.5%
    tagcloud:           19.1ms +/- 4.1%
    unpack-code:        22.7ms +/- 4.7%
    validate-input:      7.7ms +/- 6.3%



PeaceKeeper Test: (http://http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com)

Pale Moon: 1951
Waterfox: 2073



V8 Benchmark Suite: (http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/data/benchmarks/v7/run.html)

Pale Moon:
Code: [Select]
Score: 5603

Richards: 6637
DeltaBlue: 6394
Crypto: 10559
RayTrace: 2682
EarleyBoyer: 6244
RegExp: 1317
Splay: 9420
NavierStokes: 10442

Waterfox:
Code: [Select]
Score: 5904

Richards: 6785
DeltaBlue: 6711
Crypto: 10813
RayTrace: 3092
EarleyBoyer: 6832
RegExp: 1512
Splay: 9070
NavierStokes: 10347