Author Topic: New Post  (Read 6406 times)

Raeldin

  • Guest
New Post
« on: June 28, 2012, 01:16:04 PM »
Good Evening,
    This is my first post.   I played around with Masm 10 or 12 years ago.  Thought I'd play some more.  Seems like I"m gonna have to start over.  :(.   But it will be fun.


Ron


dedndave

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8828
  • Still using Abacus 2.0
    • DednDave
Re: New Post
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2012, 01:54:07 PM »
welcome to the forum, Ron   :t

Vortex

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2794
Re: New Post
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2012, 04:34:27 AM »
Hi Ron,

Welcome to the Masm Forum.

hutch--

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10583
  • Mnemonic Driven API Grinder
    • The MASM32 SDK
Re: New Post
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2012, 12:37:28 PM »
Ron,

You will like the newer stuff, its smarter, faster and much cleaner than the old DOS based interrupts, DOS and BIOS functions. Something like getting out of a T model Ford into a formula one.
hutch at movsd dot com
http://www.masm32.com    :biggrin:  :skrewy:

Raeldin

  • Guest
Re: New Post
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2012, 07:38:27 AM »
Not sure my psyche can handle that big of a change.   :shock:

I still have a Windows 2000 Programming from the Ground Up by Herbert Schildt  book.  It is C/C++ but the win32 calls should still work, won't they?


dedndave

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8828
  • Still using Abacus 2.0
    • DednDave
Re: New Post
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2012, 08:10:08 AM »
of course
you will just have to "translate" the calls to ASM syntax
i believe all win 2000 functions are still in use   :P
the book should be quite helpful

jj2007

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13957
  • Assembly is fun ;-)
    • MasmBasic
Re: New Post
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2012, 10:41:18 AM »
... but the win32 calls should still work, won't they?

Nothing has changed since. No, that's not correct: Thousands of entirely useless functions have been added with every "new" version of Windoze, but the good ol' Win32.hlp is still your best friend (check my signature for a download link).

Windows install Ghz/RAM/disk:
Atari ST   8/0.5/1
Win 3.1   25/2mb/6mb
95   ?/4/50
98   66MHz/16mb/200mb
NT   33/16/110
ME   150/32/320
2000   133/64/0.65 of 2g
XP   300/128/1.5
Vista HP   1g/1g/15 of 40g
Win 7   1g/1g/16
Ratio Vista:Win 3.1   40/500/2500

MichaelW

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1196
Re: New Post
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2012, 02:46:33 PM »
Note the jump in MHz for ME, and within my experience it was enforced.
Well Microsoft, here’s another nice mess you’ve gotten us into.