NASA: Climate changes due to shifts in solar orbit, not human activity.
A nonsense click-and-bait article digging out an old NASA paper about Milankovitch cycles. The original paper (by Steve Graham, March 24, 2000) is here. Milankovitch cycles exist, and they are well covered in the 50,000 peer-reviewed articles about climate change. But they have nothing to do with the rapid increase of the CO2 concentration in the last 60 years. Their time scale is 100,000 years.
The point here is that the article link was quickly removed from the website of "One America News Network" without any explanation. It doesn't fit UN policies.
Page not found (404)
It seems we can’t find what you’re looking for.
The "Global average temperature deviation" trend in your global warming proggy are the homogenized raw temperature data sets.
Simply by checking newspaper articles ( historical research ) of the years before 1950,
all bulls**t about today's record high average and peak temperatures, extreme weather events, bush fires, arctic ice extent etc. can be thrown in the trash can.
Apparently changing our history is part of real science, or the properties of mercury have changed and the journalists were fraudsters.
If you still believe in Mann's hockey stick science (were he eliminated previous warmth periods), then you should read this article about the findings in receding glaciers:
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2014/06/21/receding-swiss-glaciers-reveal-4000-year-old-forests-warmists-try-to-suppress-findings/Climate science funding by governments:
Pro-alarmism -> most likely funded.
Anti-alarmism -> not funded and a fat chance ending up on their funding blacklist.
Global Warming: Follow the Money
https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/02/global-warming-follow-money-henry-payne/