I see this:
I actually meant "what kind of pattern do you see, and how could we use it to fumble mantissa and exponent"
Btw..how you managed to create this curve window ? I like that a lot 
See ArrayPlot in the help file. All you need is an array:
Event Paint
ArrayPlot MyData(), RgbCol(200, 255, 255, 0), lines=4
ArrayPlot exit, "Exponential function"
Hi JJ
You mean, the result ?
I took a look at the result and compared with the same value as in wolframalpha and...for my surprise, my algo seems to be 100% accurate (At least until the 13th digit) !
These are the results i´ve got !
When using the input as
Real8 i see this number:
exp(5) =
148.4131591025766and in wolframalpha, the result is:
exp(5) =
148.4131591025766034211155800405522796234876675938789890467...
exp(-5) =
6.737946999085467e-3
in wolframalpha results in:
exp(-5) =
6.737946999085467096636048423148424248849585027355085430e-3
When i use the input as
Real4(Float), i see this:
exp(5) =
148.4131591025766exp(-5) =
6.737946999085467e-3
When i use the input as
int, i see this:
exp(5) =
148.4131591025766exp(-5) =
6.737946999085467e-3
This really surprises me, because on my initial tests, the original version from windows10 had a lack of precision after the 6th or 7th digit, but, somehow i managed to fix this damn algo, regardless the input format. So, even a int or Real4 value will result on a precise value without loss
