News:

Masm32 SDK description, downloads and other helpful links
Message to All Guests

Main Menu

I'm back, my friends!

Started by LordAdef, April 14, 2020, 09:26:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

LordAdef

I'm back and wished to say hello first.

I'm very fond of the people here. I hope everyone is safe and sound during these sad days.

Since I'm still a noob after all this time, here goes a question (that justifies it being in the Campus):
What's the best way to dynamically set the assume edi: ptr STRUCT?  I've got an array of pointers. I call a function the needs to assume, but there are different types of structures in the pointers :
ui_addPanel proc uses edi esi parent:DWORD, me:DWORD, \
                        tLeft:DWORD, tTop:DWORD, tRight:DWORD, tBottom:DWORD
    assume edi:ptr UI
    assume esi:ptr Panel           ; <=====  there can be many possible Structures, other than Panel
    mov edi, parent
    mov esi, me

    mov myLeds[2 * sizeof Led].val, 10         
    inv ui_getNextAvailableInArray, edi

    mov [edi].child[eax*4], esi        ; add the component ptr to parent array
    mcm [esi].parent, [edi].hdc        ; save the parent dc

    mam [esi].rect.left,     tLeft
    mbm [esi].rect.top,        tTop
    mcm [esi].rect.right,     tRight
    mdm [esi].rect.bottom,     tBottom

    inv ui_createComponetHdc, edi, esi, NULL

    assume edi:nothing
    assume esi:nothing
    ret
ui_addPanel endp





jj2007

Hi Alex,
Nice to see you :thup:

What exactly do you want to achieve? IMHO assume is confusing, equates are simpler and easier to read:
    mov ecx, me ; me is a pointer to a RECT
    rcme equ <[ecx.RECT]> ; for readability
    mov eax, rcme.right
    mov rcme.left, eax

aw27

You don't need to use ASSUME, there are 2 better ways.


include \masm32\include\masm32rt.inc

.data
myRect RECT <11,120,220,190>

.code

main proc
mov esi, offset myRect
mov eax, (RECT PTR [esi]).right ; method 1
sub eax, dword ptr [esi].RECT.left ; method 2

printf( "Width is %d", eax) ; expected result is 220-11=209

invoke ExitProcess, 0
main endp

end



Siekmanski

Creative coders use backward thinking techniques as a strategy.

mineiro

Bem-vindo Alexandre;
Espero que esteja bem, saúde, harmonia e serenidade.
Abraços.
I'd rather be this ambulant metamorphosis than to have that old opinion about everything

hutch--

Good to see you back again Alex, now we can expect to see some rocket code.  :thumbsup:

daydreamer

Welcome back Alex, so we can expect a 200% assembly game soon :thumbsup:
my none asm creations
https://masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=6937.msg74303#msg74303
I am an Invoker
"An Invoker is a mage who specializes in the manipulation of raw and elemental energies."
Like SIMD coding

HSE

Hi Alex!

You can do that if you developed that structures.

You have to store in a fixed position what kind of structure is. Easy if you can use the first d/qword in the structure:
t1 struct
   tipo dd 1
   ...
t1 ends
t2 struct
   tipo dd 2
  ...
t2 ends


if esi is a pointer to an structure:.if [esi] ==1
   assume esi:ptr t1
    ...
   here code using t1
    ...
.elseif [esi] == 2
   assume esi:ptr t2
    ...
   here code using t2
    ...
.endif
assume esi:nothing

Equations in Assembly: SmplMath

LordAdef

Thanks everyone for the warm greetings!
JJ and Jose, in your examples you do know the struct is a RECT. That's the point. HSE understood what I meant. HSE, I've done this sort of code before, checking the struct type. 

I just thought there should be a clever (meaning you guys) way to do it, without doing cmps. Maybe, I should rethink the code architecture in order to circumvent the limitation. There is a reason for that, by the way.
Quote
Good to see you back again Alex, now we can expect to see some rocket code.

Hi Hutch, well I will try anyway  :rolleyes:
QuoteWelcome back Alex, so we can expect a 200% assembly game soon
Hi Daydreamer, yes I am back to coding the game!

LordAdef

Hi, me again...

I was thinking about the "assume" thing.... I believe I found a way. It looks ugly but it works! I've done it assuming the ptr STRUCT  (in EBX) "before" invoking :
Caller:
ui_addPanel proc uses edi esi parent:DWORD, me:DWORD, \
                        tLeft:DWORD, tTop:DWORD, tRight:DWORD, tBottom:DWORD
    assume edi:ptr UI
    assume esi:ptr Panel
    mov edi, parent
    mov esi, me
   ; =========================
   ; HERE IS THE CODE :
    mov ebx, 111      ; this just a controller
    con "ebx BEFORE = %d", ebx

    assume ebx: ptr Panel      ; here I assume the struct type, before calling
    inv ui_testStruct, me
   ; => assume ebx:nothing   doesn't work if placed here!
    con "ebx AFTER = %d", ebx   ; ebx is ok
   ; ==================================================


in the called procedure, you don't even need to assume nothing, afaik

ui_testStruct proc uses ebx, me:DWORD
    mov ebx, me
    con "ebx within proc is  %d", [ebx].val
    ;assume ebx: nothing
    ret
ui_testStruct endp

Any thoughts?

jj2007

Ok, now I got it, I had misunderstood your problem. Here is one way to do it:
include \masm32\include\masm32rt.inc

.data
MyRect RECT <12, 34, 56, 78>
MyPoint POINT <123, 456>
MySmallRect SMALL_RECT <11, 22, 33, 44>

.code
mytest proc uses esi edi pWhatever, StructType
  mov eax, StructType
  mov esi, pWhatever
  dec eax
  .If Sign?
print "it's a rect, and right="
print str$([esi.RECT.right]), 13, 10
  .else
dec eax
.If Sign?
print "it's a point, and x="
print str$([esi.POINT.x]), 13, 10
.else
dec eax
.If Sign?
print "it's a smallrect, and right="
print str$([esi.SMALL_RECT.Right]), 13, 10
.endif
.endif
  .endif

  ret
mytest endp

start:
  cls
  invoke mytest, addr MyRect, 0
  invoke mytest, addr MyPoint, 1
  invoke mytest, addr MySmallRect, 2
  exit

end start


Personally, I would prefer this one, for better readability:
include \masm32\include\masm32rt.inc

.data
MyRect RECT <12, 34, 56, 78>
MyPoint POINT <123, 456>
MySmallRect SMALL_RECT <11, 22, 33, 44>

.code
rc equ <[esi.RECT]>
pt equ <[esi.POINT]>
src equ <[esi.SMALL_RECT]>

mytest proc uses esi edi pWhatever, StructType
  mov eax, StructType
  mov esi, pWhatever
  dec eax
  .If Sign?
print "it's a rect, and right="
print str$(rc.right), 13, 10
  .else
dec eax
.If Sign?
print "it's a point, and x="
print str$(pt.x), 13, 10
.else
dec eax
.If Sign?
print "it's a smallrect, and right="
print str$(src.Right), 13, 10
.endif
.endif
  .endif

  ret
mytest endp

start:
  cls
  invoke mytest, addr MyRect, 0
  invoke mytest, addr MyPoint, 1
  invoke mytest, addr MySmallRect, 2
  exit

end start


Just for fun, one more - the smallest exe:
include \masm32\include\masm32rt.inc

.data
dd 0
MyRect RECT <12, 34, 56, 78>
dd 1
MyPoint POINT <123, 456>
dd 2
MySmallRect SMALL_RECT <11, 22, 33, 44>

.code
rc equ <[esi.RECT]>
pt equ <[esi.POINT]>
src equ <[esi.SMALL_RECT]>

mytest proc uses esi edi pWhatever
  mov esi, pWhatever
  lodsd
  dec eax
  .If Sign?
print "it's a rect, and right="
print str$(rc.right), 13, 10
  .else
dec eax
.If Sign?
print "it's a point, and x="
print str$(pt.x), 13, 10
.else
dec eax
.If Sign?
print "it's a smallrect, and right="
print str$(src.Right), 13, 10
.endif
.endif
  .endif
  ret
mytest endp

start:
  cls
  invoke mytest, addr MyRect-4
  invoke mytest, addr MyPoint-4
  invoke mytest, addr MySmallRect-4
  exit

end start


Attention with the last one, you need a good assembler (UAsm, AsmC, JWasm) for it. MASM has a bug:
print str$(src.Right), 13, 10
translates to
push offset 004030A9
push 0                         ; ÚArg2 = 0
push word ptr [esi+4]          ; ³Arg1
call dwtoa                     ; ÀNewMasm32.dwtoa


UAsm translates it correctly to
push offset 004030A9           ; ÚArg2 = NewMasm32.4030A9
movzx eax, word ptr [esi+4]    ; ³
push eax                       ; ³Arg1
call dwtoa                     ; ÀNewMasm32.dwtoa

HSE

Hi Aex!

This code:    assume ebx: ptr Panel      ; here I assume the struct type, before calling
    inv ui_testStruct, me
   ; => assume ebx:nothing   doesn't work if placed here!
    con "ebx AFTER = %d", ebx   ; ebx is ok

Is equal to:
    inv ui_testStruct, me
   assume ebx: ptr Panel     
   con "ebx AFTER = %d", ebx   ; ebx is ok


assume is an instruccion for the assembler at assembling time, and is sequential. The procedure ui_testStruct is in another place, and t's not affected in any way by assume.
Equations in Assembly: SmplMath

deeR44

QuoteI'm back, my friends!

Finally! I've been waiting and waiting and waiting. I'm so glad! Wow!

TouEnMasm


If you don't want to use assume,you can also use TEXTEQU

adrect TEXTEQU <[R10].RECT>
.code
lea r10,rect
mov R11D,adrect.left
Fa is a musical note to play with CL