News:

Masm32 SDK description, downloads and other helpful links
Message to All Guests
NB: Posting URL's See here: Posted URL Change

Main Menu

Which is "better"?

Started by CCurl, October 15, 2015, 01:19:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

jj2007

#15
October 17, 2015, 02:57:42 AM
Quote from: raymond on October 17, 2015, 02:51:26 AM"mov [esi],eax" would be sufficient (unless you really enjoy the extra typing) because the size is already specified by the size of the register. Are other assemblers more fussy???

You are perfectly right, Raymond :t

Re fussiness, JWasm occasionally is a bit more demanding, and in general, caution with SSE and FPU code is a good idea. movq is also a special case with some versions of ML.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions