Echo value of offset

[TimoVJL]

Problems come when using on bounds...

Bounds? as in array bound checking?
Just curious.

As bounds of assembler abilities. A default solution is the immediate value, but i need to get that from the expression of offsets.

masm isn't high level language, just with macro language additions.

[Rockphorr]

Problems come when using on bounds...

Bounds? as in array bound checking?
Just curious.

As bounds of assembler abilities. A default solution is the immediate value, but i need to get that from the expression of offsets.

masm isn't high level language, just with macro language additions.

Yes it is. By the assembly we write code as we need, but we also need to solve addresses and expressions automatic.

[NoCforMe]

Yes it is [a high-level language]. By the assembly we write code as we need, but we also need to solve addresses and expressions automatic.

It's a mid-level language then: certainly higher than punching in raw opcodes in binary, but nowhere near as high level as, say, C++, where all kinds of calculations (addresses, array indices, structure selectors) are done for you behind the scenes.

[Rockphorr]

Any way, we enjoy by the lea instruction       

[daydreamer]

It's a mid-level language then: certainly higher than punching in raw opcodes in binary, but nowhere near as high level as, say, C++, where all kinds of calculations (addresses, array indices, structure selectors) are done for you behind the scenes.

For asm programmers:
More freedom howto code ,but responsible for code adresses right or its buggy code instead of compiler automatically codes byte,word,dword/real4,qword/real8 arrays right
Ofcourse i could use masm way to code struct arrays if i want or take care of itself with manually code it