News:

Masm32 SDK description, downloads and other helpful links
Message to All Guests

Main Menu

ReactOS

Started by shankle, June 18, 2013, 06:20:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

shankle

Read about this OS under development on Source Forge.
It seems to be patterned after Windows XP.
Has anyone tried it??
If so would you care to expound a bit here Please.
I couldn't tell from the article what stage the development
is in.
Seems to be a better choice than the Linux mess.
Microsoft sure needs some competition.

anta40

Hi,

Last time I tried ReactOS is 2010, I think.
I could run Pelles C on it.
It's always stated that "is still under heavy development (alpha stage) and is not ready for everyday use.".
Please give it a try.

And yes, it would be nice if MS have a competitor.

FORTRANS

Hi,

   I have not tried it.  But I think there was some mention of it
on the newsgroup alt.os.development a while back.

Regards,

Steve N.

shankle

Thanks for responding Guys.
Anta40 - have you tried it lately?
That was 3 years ago. Surely some progress has been made.
Hope it's not like Linux which has to many chiefs and not enough Indians.

Adamanteus

 I tried it when had P-II, on later models of CPU it's crashed - so be accurate.

GoneFishing

I tried one of the older versions of ReactOS in VirtualBox.
I think it may be very useful for educational purposes as the example of open source Windows-like (Windows-compatible) operating system.
I will not be much surprised if you'll find one of ReactOS's main developers - Alex Ionescu  - here on this site.

shankle

Found more info on ReactOS.
They are working on FAT. Why? Why not go straight to NTFS?
Tried to do a live run of ReactOS from a cd and it didn't work.
Tried to do a live run of ReactOS from a stick and it didn't work.
Maybe my bios is not configured correctly. I have trouble with
the bios on this crappy Pavilion. Don't think they have software
for the USB yet.
I'll check them out again in 2015. Right now I feel ReactOS is worthless.

japheth

Quote from: shankle on July 06, 2013, 05:47:47 AM
They are working on FAT. Why? Why not go straight to NTFS?

FAT is simpler and better.

Quote
I'll check them out again in 2015. Right now I feel ReactOS is worthless.

Probably too harsh. I very recently installed ReactOS on VirtualBox and it worked on first shot. I also installed Firefox on ReactOS and it works - so it definitely has some value. Hint: DO NOT use any VirtualBox images with preinstalled ReactOS - instead create a VirtualBox VM and then go thru the "normal" installation process for ReactOS.

anta40

Quote from: japheth on July 06, 2013, 03:17:17 PM
FAT is simpler and better.

I'm curious why  :icon_confused:

Vortex

Quote from: anta40 on July 06, 2013, 03:58:11 PM
Quote from: japheth on July 06, 2013, 03:17:17 PM
FAT is simpler and better.

I'm curious why  :icon_confused:

NTFS is a very complicated design.

FORTRANS

Hi,

   I think there are fewer problems with patent and trademark
protection with FAT.

Steve