Environmental activists against works of art

[caballero]

A opulent society is distinguished when many people neither study nor work, or when the productive economy is destroyed following certain dogmas.

What would happen on the basis of "who breaks it pays it" thing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ihVm7FBF0

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8eyxju

[jj2007]

You are a joker, caballero. Do you have the faintest idea what will happen to "works of art" when Venice will be flooded?

[caballero]

Aha, as we face the end of the world, let's annihilate each other. In the end, we are all going to disappear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonestown


Suppose we are facing the end of the world. Why is yours the valid solution?

[hutch--]

Sad to say, Venice is already subject to flooding, comes from being built on a swamp so its not global whoremongering (whoops I mean warming), its foundations that keep sinking.

> Suppose we are facing the end of the world. Why is yours the valid solution?

Back in the 60s, the solution was simple, with a potential nuclear war, "Kiss your arse goodbye". 

> A opulent society is distinguished when many people neither study nor work, or when the productive economy is destroyed following certain dogmas.

I think this translates to a society that carries a load of unproductive parasites living off the hard work of those who get things done. Gabfest is no substitute for people who ARE productive, from the humble factory worker to the creative individual.

The Russians some years ago had a system where those who did the hard dirty work got paid the most and those in cushy office jobs got paid peanuts.

[Siekmanski]

This is our youth.
They create their own future based on the fairy tales they learn in the schools and universities sponsored by Soros.
They will be happy. 
They will own nothing. 

If you tell them you're for freedom and democracy, they'll call you a facsist. 

Beam me up, Scotty....

[Siekmanski]

A opulent society is distinguished when many people neither study nor work, or when the productive economy is destroyed following certain dogmas.

What would happen on the basis of "who breaks it pays it" thing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ihVm7FBF0

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8eyxju

Press, media, men with cameras and soylets standby as this protest is enacted.
This is simply setup and allowed, a theatrical performance made possible by museum management.
Clear them all out. Start again. They are corrupt beyond belief.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1580877593154228224

[jj2007]

What would happen on the basis of "who breaks it pays it" thing?

Dutch farmers would have to pay an awful lot of money for destroying the ground water

[hutch--]

 

It may not matter to the whiners if they starved to death. Much like the woke green agenda, if they are freezing to death or starving to death, would they care ?

Behind the loonie tunes trying to save the planet is the assumption that if you remove the human species, you will save the planet.

The planet could not care less, contrary to popular mythology, the planet is an almost spherical ball of rotating molten iron mixed with other junk that has a cooled skin on it and some fungus that sticks to part of the outside surface due to the amount of water on the surface and life forms (as we know it) live off the fungus. The planet needs nothing.

Behind the bullsh*t is the need for human beings to maintain an environment that they can survive in and it has nothing to do with saving the planet, it has to do with saving their arse. Over populate and natural selection will level the playing field, defoliate the planet and more will starve to death, keep dumping junk in the sea and you will kill off more inhabitants and more people will starve to death.

Natural selection is a real bitch like that.

[Greenhorn]

> Behind the loonie tunes trying to save the planet is the assumption that if you remove the human species, you will save the planet.

2018: Clade X – A bioweapon for population reduction

2022: Monkeypox: experts give virus variants new names

[hutch--]

Interesting articles and a good reason to avoid globalist associations.

Now the catch is for the global elite that some malicious actor with enough know how, may find a way to reverse the top down protection that the elite may have and produce a bottom up "nasty" that whacks the beautiful people. Wouldn't it be funny if the plebs inherited the Earth after the effluent (whoops I mean Affluent) faded into legend. 

[caballero]

Getty oil fortune heiress helped fund climate activists who have targeted artworks and museums

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/10/21/getty-oil-heiress-funds-climate-crisis-activism-just-stop-oil

[jj2007]

If pouring ketchup on a lousy Van Gogh painting helps to make people aware that, for example, the immense artwork in Venice will be swallowed up by the sea if we don't act now against climate change, then Ms Getty's money is well spent.

[jj2007]

2018: Clade X – A bioweapon for population reduction

An excellent read, thanks

The risk of pandemics caused by extreme right nutters is real, so it's really a good thing that competent experts and politicians prepare for such a scenario

[TimoVJL]

Some leaders thinks, that blocking food supplies to wrong coloured people will be a good choice, as then they can rule resources in some countries.

[jj2007]

These wrong coloured people are a difficult bunch

The first Ukraine grain cargo refused by buyer -Ukrainian embassy in Lebanon

the first ship to depart Ukraine under an U.N.-brokered deal, is looking for another port to unload its grain cargo as the initial Lebanese buyer refused delivery