Pelles C version 12.00 Release Candidate

[Vortex]

Announced by Pelle :

http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/changes_1100_1200.htm

http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

[Vortex]

Announced by Pelle :

Pelles C version 12.00 (Release Candidate #2) is now available for download:
http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

Changes for RC2:
Removed declaration of __unreachable() from <intrin.h>
Updated help file (typos, bad links, some text)
Fixed C runtime problem with "%2lc" counting bytes, rather than characters, for a multibyte UTF-8 character.
Fixed compiler problem with nested bit-field expressions.
Fixed IDE problem with visible size not being updated when changing bitmap size through one of the drag handles.
Fixed problem with missing BOM when saving modified text resource (HTML/MANIFEST/RCDATA).

[jj2007]

Fixed C runtime problem with "%2lc" counting bytes, rather than characters, for a multibyte UTF-8 character.

Interesting that the compiler deals with that; I always thought printf() & friends were offered by the OS.

[Vortex]

Hi Jochen,

You are right, printf and the variants are exported by msvcrt.dll but Pelle's C run-time library is providing the same functions. Same with MinGW.

http://masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=77.0

[morgot]

Hello, Vortex
have you tested this version? Will it work with the SDK (unofficial, I don't remember the author)?

[Vortex]

Hi morgot,

I newly started to test the new release. The members of Pelles forum are sending their reports. Pelle is doing a very nice job.

I guess this is what you are looking for :

An update to date SDK for PellesC compiler suite :

https://github.com/Frankie-PellesC/fSDK

This package needs to be tested with Pelles C version 12.0, thanks for your suggestion.

[Vortex]

Announced by Pelle :

Version 12.00 is now released.

http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

Changes from Release Candidate #2:

Fixed POASM problem with null terminator being included in internal length of string literal and literal text (failing concatenate operations).
Fixed POMC problem with cryptic error message for unexpected end of file.
Fixed POFMT problem with '%' changed to '%%', and '%=' changed to '%%='.
Minor documentation update (POASM @CatStr() macro vs directive).

[jj2007]

Tested and approved

;-)

[greenozon]

Announced by Pelle :

Version 12.00 is now released.

http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

Changes from Release Candidate #2:

Fixed POASM problem with null terminator being included in internal length of string literal and literal text (failing concatenate operations).
Fixed POMC problem with cryptic error message for unexpected end of file.
Fixed POFMT problem with '%' changed to '%%', and '%=' changed to '%%='.
Minor documentation update (POASM @CatStr() macro vs directive).

link ->  https://prnt.sc/H-7zENrBrbt1

[Vortex]

Hi greenozon,

No any issues expect the certificate warning :

https://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

[TimoVJL]

Perhaps using this link works normally:
http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

[zedd151]

Perhaps using this link works normally:
http://www.smorgasbordet.com/pellesc/download.htm

Yes with "http" the page loads fine, with "https" you will get the "certificate error" message, since the site apparently does not actually reside at a "https" URL or have the security certificate for it.
Tested on iPad and Safari browser, btw.

I fixed the link within the quote, Timo. 

Read this, regarding posting URL's  here on the forum to make them 'clickable' : https://masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=11407.msg124944#msg124944
Stewart (stoo23) will greatly appreciate it. 

I would like to take this opportunity to mention....
He alone, is the person that must manually correct URLs that are not properly "clickable"... and there have been dozens if not hundreds posted that way, since the News Item "NB: Posting URL's"  has been posted.

It seems several forum members have never bothered to read it, (or have read it but disregard it?) Mostly long time members, btw... not only yourself. I am not trying to single out any members in particular.

This goes for anyone else reading this, that posts URLs that are not "clickable".

Personally, I manually use bbcode tags for posting URLs, even on my iPad. Others prefer using the button for posting URLs ( in the post editor window).

[NoCforMe]

Personally, I manually use bbcode tags for posting URLs, even on my iPad. Others prefer using the button for posting URLs ( in the post editor window).

The Insert a link button You cannot view this attachment. in the Post reply pane is so much easier to use: just click it, paste the link address in the URL field, click INSERT and Bob's your uncle.

No need to remember the BB link code syntax.

[zedd151]

Personally, I manually use bbcode tags for posting URLs, even on my iPad. Others prefer using the button for posting URLs ( in the post editor window).

No need to remember the BB link code syntax.

For me, that comes from old habits. On some forums that I used to frequent, they did not have any button for URL links. If you needed to add a title for instance, you had to do it manually back then. Kinda like muscle memory I guess, it just comes natural to me now.