Perhaps if I knew more (this is the first time I've seen, or read, him) I'd agree with your assessment. I only wish all crackpots were as intelligent and well-spoken.
Yeah.. me too.
I felt he was pushing it too far wrt Adolph, coming to conclusions, that I felt, suited his
agenda. (Same as stats)
A quick search on him reveals a person not shy of controversy... in a way a good thing as it's brings to light, dirt swept under the carpet.
Those countries that arrested/banned him should have rather taken him to task in a constructive televised debate (etc).. as all they've done is acted like any totalitarian state does - elevating him to higher prominance.
Then if he was proven to be wrong.. which shouldn't be hard to do on that topic, he'd either have to recant or no-one would buy his books anymore($$$).
The stuff on Churchill himself was 'enlightening', then again Churchill was like any other polititian.. except it seems.. he was 'permanently plastered'.

I always think the trouble in the middle east is mainly though western intervention and 'trouble making'.. which I think the Saudi's have a lot to benefit from ;)
They never seem to get involved, unless provoked... and this provoking comes from the Arabs themselves, otherwise they're verrrry quiet.
So as hutch says.. the money systems and empires come into play.
8)