Guns do not fall out of the sky into the hands of criminals;
Drugs don't fall out of the sky in the hands of criminals either. The fact that these drugs are entirely outlawed hasn't slowed the drugs in the hands of criminals one iota. What gives?
Their data shows that states with weak gun laws have a crime gun export rate nine times higher than states with strong gun laws.
Well naturally. Companies move were they have the cheapest operating cost too, just like I buy my gas where it's cheapest. In way way is that evidence of causality? It would be delusional to think that just by tightening up equally in all states the criminals will suddenly go, bummer, no more guns. No, they take over the manufacture and distribution for themselves!
Statistics show that states with higher gun ownership and weak gun laws lead the nation in gun deaths rates per 100,000 people. For example Louisiana, Alabama, Alaska, Mississippi and Nevada have household gun ownership rates from 31.5 percent to 60.6 percent and gun death rates of 16.5 per 100,000 to 19.5 per 100,000.
Perhaps you didn't read my spill above about correlation verses causation, or perhaps it just doesn't suit your needs to think through. Where is your evidence that it's not the crime rate that drives the gun ownership, rather than the gun ownership driving the crime? How many of these gun deaths are purely defensive against the crime criminals? How many are accidental? How many are gang related? You are just grouping, by your own terminology, "gun deaths" in one big pot irrespective of causal factors.
In comparison states with low gun ownership rates and strong gun laws such as Hawaii, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey and New York, with household gun ownership rates from 9.7 percent to 18.1 percent have gun death rates of 2.8 per 100,000 to 5.2 per 100,000.
And what are the legal differences here? Rhode Island is a must issue state, where no qualified individual may be denied a permit to carry a concealed weapon. Connecticut is effectively the same way. The rest share a "may issue" status with with many listed in your high crime group. Alabama, from your first list, is a may issue state. In fact there is no correlation between the legal status of guns and these states.
Why did you cherry pick these particular states anyway? I can explain why, as these states are sorted for the explicit purpose of said argument. Sad that even cherry picked states fail to show correlations between gun laws, as opposed to ownership, but it's the best they could jury rig the argument.
The fact is stronger gun laws do save lives!
If you would only look at the evidence it would be obvious you have one of those theory dependent facts... How can you claim a fact when you are arguing gun laws, then used cherry picked numbers to show correlations with gun ownership without mentioning how the correlation completely fails against gun "laws"? I mean for real!!!
Since you apparently will not go read yourself, check these out:
Source:
http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp



But gun lovers will continue to cling to their guns like a six year old does to a Teddy Bear, all the while spouting silly platitudes such as "guns don't kill people" or "criminals will get a gun regardless" or “cars kill more people then guns” while more and more innocent people are murdered by gun wielding maniacs. They will continue to worship the gun as their lord and savior and continue willingly to sacrifice tens of thousands of innocent American lives at the altar of their holy temple.
Now there you go with the same BS without ever even bothering to hand wave my objections and request. I don't own a gun and it's highly unlikely that I ever will, but this kind of BS is.. uhh.. BS.
It didn't take bullets to fill your bucket full of holes.