News:

Masm32 SDK description, downloads and other helpful links
Message to All Guests
NB: Posting URL's See here: Posted URL Change

Main Menu

negative value

Started by shankle, April 21, 2014, 04:34:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

shankle

 Thanks for any help.
The following code produces a negative value in FileBuffer,
  when it should be a positive value.

   FileBuffer       db  59 DUP (0)
   BufAdd           dq  0
   GTotalAccum      dq  0

   1st I clear FileBuffer to 0h
   GTotalAccum is a positive value
   after the below code FileBuffer is negative
   It should be a positive value
   
    mov rcx,Q[GTotalAccum]    ; input
    lea rbx,FileBuffer        ; output
    mov Q[BufAdd],rbx
;   changed rdx to rcx in a 64 bit program
    invoke dwtoa, rcx,[BufAdd]      ; Hex DD to string
                                     ; output is in FileBuffer

dwtoa:
     FRAME dwValue,lpBuffer
     USES esi,edi
   
    ; -------------------------------------------------------------
    ; convert DWORD to ascii string
    ; dwValue is value to be converted
    ; lpBuffer is the address of the receiving buffer
    ; EXAMPLE:
    ; invoke dwtoa,edx,ADDR buffer
    ;
    ; Uses: eax, ecx, edx.
    ; -------------------------------------------------------------
      mov   eax,[dwValue]
      mov edi,[lpBuffer]

      test eax, eax         ; is the value negative
      jns >
      mov B[edi], '-'         ; store a minus sign
      inc edi
      neg eax              ; and invert the value
:
      mov esi, edi           ; save pointer to first digit
      mov ecx, 10
.convert
      test eax,eax           ; while there is more to convert   
      jz >
      xor edx, edx
      div ecx              ; put next digit in edx
      add dl, '0'           ; convert to ASCII
      mov [edi],dl           ; store it
      inc edi
      jmp <.convert
:   
     mov B[edi], 0          ; terminate the string

.reverse                    ; We now have all the digits,
                            ; but in reverse order.
      cmp esi,edi
      jae >
      dec edi
      mov al,[esi]
      mov ah,[edi]
      mov [edi],al
      mov [esi],ah
      inc esi
      jmp <.reverse
:
    ret
ENDF

Yuri

What value did you use? Maybe it's greater than 32 bits and you should use RAX for it rather than EAX (in dwtoa)?

shankle

Thanks Yuri for replying.
I have the same program written in MASM32 that is working.
Am trying to convert it to GoAsm 64-bit. So far all the values
written to the screen work, except for the Grand total line,
which is turning up negative.

jj2007

mov al,[esi]

Excuse my ignorance: Are 32-bit pointers legal in 64-bit code?

Yuri

Since they work, they must be legal. But the instruction is one byte longer.

Gunther

Jochen,

Quote from: jj2007 on April 21, 2014, 10:29:32 PM
Excuse my ignorance: Are 32-bit pointers legal in 64-bit code?

here's an interesting article about that topic.

Gunther
You have to know the facts before you can distort them.

jj2007

Quote from: Yuri on April 21, 2014, 11:27:44 PM
Since they work, they must be legal.
The x32 ABI uses 32-bit pointers, but it requires an appropriate OS setup. Without that, one should check if it works always with ASLR enabled...

Yuri

Quote from: jj2007 on April 22, 2014, 12:56:57 AM
The x32 ABI uses 32-bit pointers, but it requires an appropriate OS setup. Without that, one should check if it works always with ASLR enabled...
Yes, you are right. They are better avoided.

Gunther

Yuri,

Quote from: Yuri on April 22, 2014, 01:54:19 AM
Yes, you are right. They are better avoided.

no doubt about that.

Jochen,

we had a discussion about the point some months ago. Do you remember?

Gunther
You have to know the facts before you can distort them.

shankle

The program that is giving me so much trouble is a working program in MASM32.
Evidently MASM32 is very forgiving about signed and unsigned numbers and the math
done on them. The same input data is used both programs. I am just trying to
convert the MASM32 program to GoAsm 64-bit. It doesn't seen to have anything to do
with the MASM32 "dwtoa" code submitted above. Rather I think it has to do with my
dubious knowledge of how GoAsm plays with the sign bit. I have tested each field I am
trying to process and the test shows that each field is negative when it can't be
negative. ALL input data is POSITIVE. :icon_redface:



sinsi

You are passing rcx to dwtoa but only processing the low 32-bits.
What happens when rcx is a positive dq but the low 32-bits are negative?
e.g. rcx=1ffffffff (positive) but ecx=ffffffff (negative).

Change dwtoa to use 64-bit registers.
Windows 11 is better :tongue: but 98SE was the bee's knees