MASM FOR FUN - REBORN - #0 Extract low order bytes from dwords

[nidud]

deleted

[nidud]

deleted

[frktons]

With adjustment for the loop (mov ecx,4096/16):

---------------------------------------------------------
1125    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - I shot
1088    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - II shot
---------------------------------------------------------
1124    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - I shot
1140    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - II shot
---------------------------------------------------------

In the first shot 4096/4 refers to the dwords to elaborate in each cycle,
so it cannot be 4096/16.
The second one works on 16 dwords at a time, so it is 4096/16.

[nidud]

deleted

[frktons]

I'm going to prepare a real test, with some data to make the masks
a little bit more accurate. They are not tested for the time being, and
were used just to have an idea of their performances.

After testing on real data and adjusting the masks accordingly, the
test could be considered valid.

Up to now I've worked on uninitializes data, so there is no way to
know if the sequence of bit/bytes in the masks are correct.  ::)

[nidud]

deleted

[frktons]

I think it does what it suppose to do

Well, a good test should start with 4096 dword initialized with 00000001h
and then use the single routines with it, testing if at the end there are all 01h
in the Dest buffer, and to verify it you could use your routine.

[jj2007]

Hi Frank,

Here is a testfile. The exe shows it, *.asc is the source in RTF/RichMasm format.

Hope it helps,
Jochen

[nidud]

deleted

[frktons]

This was implemented using macros for each test. You need to reset the byte buffer (Dest) for each test, using 0 if source is 1, or 1 if source is 0 (as in this case).

Yes nidud, thanks.

Hi Frank,

Here is a testfile. The exe shows it, *.asc is the source in RTF/RichMasm format.

Hope it helps,
Jochen

Grazie Jochen, il tuo aiuto è sempre benvenuto.

I'll give it a look as soon as I finish a couple of prelimary
things I'm working on.

[frktons]

Is there an opcode to compare two xmm register to verify
if they have the same content?

Again SIMD instructions are a bit tricky for simple instructions.

[qWord]

See the CMPxxx, COMxxx and PCMPxxx instructions: AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 4: 128-bit and 256 bit media instructions

[frktons]

See the CMPxxx, COMxxx and PCMPxxx instructions: AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 4: 128-bit and 256 bit media instructions

Yes qWord,

Let's assume I use:

Code Select Expand


   PCMPEQD xmm0,xmm1


considering this and the others don't affect the flags,
how do I jmp somewhere after the test?
If they are equal or not, what tells me that?

PTEST affect the Zero Flag, but the opcode is out of my league (SSE4.1).

[frktons]

The first correct test for SSE instructions with proc to check the results:

Code Select Expand


Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz (SSE4)
---------------------------------------------------------
13862   cycles for MOV AX - Test OK
13114   cycles for LEA - Test OK
6195    cycles for MMX/PUNPCKLBW - Test OK
3157    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - I shot - Test OK
2375    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - II shot - Test OK
12327   STOSB - Test OK
---------------------------------------------------------
9238    cycles for MOV AX - Test OK
8723    cycles for LEA - Test OK
4130    cycles for MMX/PUNPCKLBW - Test OK
3150    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - I shot - Test OK
2375    cycles for XMM/PSHUFB - II shot - Test OK
16701   STOSB - Test OK
---------------------------------------------------------

--- ok ---


Attached last version.

Enjoy

[nidud]

deleted